Month: May 2019

Asbestos workers have a high risk of mesothelioma. It has been proven by researchers. Mesothelioma of the pleural is a rare pleural disease. It is very easy to be overlooked. However, it is difficult to diagnose pleural mesothelioma in its early stages because its symptoms often mimic the symptoms of other common illnesses, such as the flu, pneumonia or laryngitis. Mesothelioma symptoms are similar to lung cancer, Because of these similarities, as well as the relative rarity of mesothelioma in the general population, the disease is not always diagnosed and often grows untreated for many months. Mesothelioma is a rare disorder, affecting about three thousand people per year, while lung cancer has a diagnostic rate 65 times greater than mesothelioma with nearly 200, 000 yearly diagnoses. Many patients were misdiagnosed as asbestos cancer. Asbestos has been banned in Europe. Because many people suffer mesothelioma due to lax laws regarding control of asbestos in the mid-twentieth century, a body of law has grown up around this illness. Workers exposed to asbestos receive regular physical examinations. The employer must provide the necessary protective equipment for asbestos workers to prevent asbestos cancer.

The company must comply with the asbestos regulations of the Clean Air Act to ensure that workers and others are not exposed to asbestos and the danger of contracting the deadly diseases exposure can cause. The people who are living near the factory have the same risk of asbestos disease. The asbestos victims should hire an asbestos attorney when they are diagnosed with asbestos cancer or mesothelioma. Choose an experienced asbestos attorney or law firm is able to help people suffering from this deadly form of cancer to gain compensation in cases of negligent exposure to asbestos. The asbestos victims can also get claims if they can provide enough evidence. Ten years ago, or a few decades ago. Many lawyers and law firms have made Mesotheleoma their area of expertise. They have studied and researched the symptoms, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment for many years. They can provide the best solutions for the victims. The best treatment time will not be delayed because of health conditions is the best proof. We suggest choosing a law firm that has experience with jury trials involving asbestosrelated diseases, knows about how asbestos was used in various industries and around the home and keeps uptodate concerning medical science.

While most fair people will argue that the laws against marijuana possession and distribution are harsh in the western world, perhaps we should be thankful for small blessings! While in many countries cannabis seeds and the fully grown crop are perfectly legal, there are many countries with far more authoritarian control that have been known to pass the death penalty for cannabis users, so if you plan on getting high anytime soon, you may want to avoid the following oppressive countries if you value your life!

Used to Have Death Penalty

The Philippines used to enforce the death penalty for a period of 4 years between 2002 and 2006. To qualify for this harsh punishment, you would need to have been carrying over 500 grams of cannabis or over 10 grams of cocaine, ecstasy, morphine, opium or heroin.

Occasional Death Penalty

Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and Borneo have all sentenced with the death penalty for marijuana related offences in the past. Although the majority of these punishments were for trafficking offences, it would still be considered unwise to bring in any cannabis to the countries even if its intended for personal use.

Dubai has earned special recognition for its zero tolerance approach to drugs. Earlier this year a 25 year old man was sentenced to four years in prison for a 0.003 gram speck of cannabis found on his shoe, and another man was detained for possessing 3 poppy seeds that had fallen off the top of a bread roll! The country uses incredibly sophisticated technology that can detect trace amounts of various drugs and the mandatory sentence is 4 years, so be especially careful if flying to Dubai!

Frequent Death Penalty

Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and Peoples Republic of China all still use the death penalty for varying quantities of drugs including cannabis. Thailand made the headlines when it undertook its war on drugs in which 2,275 people were killed, according to Human Rights Watch and many of these were believed to be extrajudicially executed. For its part, China is estimated to kill 500 people per year over drugs offences according to Amnesty International.

As a bonus nation, heres a surprise inclusion: the USA. While it has never actually been law, in 1996 Speaker Newt Gingrich proposed a mandatory death penalty for second time offences of smuggling 50g or more cannabis into the country. The proposal failed. The 1994 Crime Act states that a possible death sentence for marijuana offences would involve 60,000 kilograms of the drum or 60,000 plants, or bring in a profit of more than $20,000,000 per year. Regardless, the Supreme Court has held that only murder and treason constitutionally can carry the death penalty.

So the next time you want to moan about your government allowing the distribution of cannabis seeds but making it illegal to grow them, just remember that more draconian governments can make your life far more difficult sometimes by ending it! If youre planning on travelling to the Far East, you should think twice before packing the bong and the marijuana!

Notice to employees working on government contracts (Service Contracts Act) labor law poster; Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division oversee this labor law poster. Every contractor or subcontractor engaged in a contract with the United States or the District of Columbia in excess of $2,500 the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the U.S. through the use of service employees must display this labor law poster.

Notice: employee polygraph protection act labor law poster; Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division oversee this labor law poster. Any employer engaged in or affecting commerce or in the production of goods for commerce must display this labor law poster. Does not apply to federal, state and local governments, or to circumstances covered by the national defense and security exemption.

Notice migrant and seasonal agricultural worker protection act labor law poster; Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division oversee this labor law poster. Agricultural employers, agricultural associations and farm labor contractors must display this labor law posters.

Now is the time to think about updating your labor law posters to avoid fines and prevent lawsuits. Don’t wait until you get fined get your mandatory labor law posters compliant today. One less thing you have to “get a round too”. Dont mess with the law, Osha compliance, and state and federal labor law poster posting requirements are Mandatory, get your Labor law posters updated today. Keep in mind that your state may require additional labor law poster postings.

The decision to divorce is not an easy one and nor is the decision regarding which solicitor should represent you. We have come up with 5 simple tips which should help you find the ideal solicitor to help you through your divorce.

Dont use your normal solicitor – Although you might already have a solicitor you have used before; for example for a house purchase. It is nice to have a relationship with your solicitor but they might not be best suited to the situation. Solicitors tend to specialise in certain areas and it really helps to get the right horse for the right course. Much like you wouldnt get a carpenter to repair a leaky tap, youre better off getting a solicitor who is a divorce specialist representing you.

Visit the solicitor in person Your emotional and financial well-being may well be affected by the outcome of your divorce and the decision about who represents you shouldnt be taken lightly. You may well have to tell them secrets about your relationship and almost certainly will have to reveal your financial circumstances as well, so its important to find someone you trust and feel comfortable talking to in person.

Check their experience While each relationship breakdown is different and unique, its important to check that your solicitor has had relevant experience. For example if you see your settlement going to court, be sure to check whether they have had any courtroom exposure in similar cases. It might also be worth asking if they have any testimonials from their other clients.

Ask about fees Dont be scared to approach the subject of cost from the outset. Its vital to know how much the solicitors services will cost you. Dont feel embarrassed asking, they will be used to being asked and normally are quite upfront about their fees. While it is certainly not the best strategy to choose your solicitor by price alone, dont be afraid to shop around.

Go with your gut feeling At the end of the day you will be placing quite a lot of trust in the person you choose to represent you, so you should go with your heart. Someone might be perfectly qualified, with lots of experience and competitively priced but something doesnt quite feel right. If thats the case you shouldnt have a problem with looking elsewhere. You dont have to be friends with your solicitor but a good relationship certainly helps!

Temecula Immigration Law – What Are Your Chances of Success?

Temecula, CA Immigration Lawyer, John Mansfield, explains:

One of the most common questions that I’m asked is “What Are My Chances of winning my immigration law case?” or, “Will I win My Immigration Case?.” Obviously, the answer to that question depends on several factors.

First, your case must fit within one of the legally recognized categories approved for granting relief. Certainly you will want to go to an immigration attorney who is going to give you an honest evaluation of your immigration case. Be sure that you are honest and forthcoming with your lawyer even at the first consultation, to ensure you get an educated and fully informed legal opinion regarding your chances of success in an immigration case.

A huge factor in the success or failure of an immigration case is selecting the right attorney. You may have a comfortable relationship with your family attorney that perhaps draws up wills and trusts, or maybe someone who handle your divorce or does personal injury, but you’ve got be very careful. You don’t want to use someone who is not familiar with the complex immigration laws. Understand that just because someone may be an attorney, he or she may not necessarily be an expert with immigration law.

Immigration law is unlike any other area except, perhaps, tax law. It’s similar to tax law in that it’s very complex, it’s very technical and it changes almost every day. I would say immigration law changes even faster and more frequently than tax law does. You really want someone who is either a specialist or exclusively practices in the area of immigration and nationality law. It’s that technical, it’s that complex, and if you have been in the system or know someone who has, then you certainly know that to be true.

Whether you are going to win your case or have a good chance of winning, depends greatly on whether you disclose any criminal records, or previous deportations. Perhaps you’ve taken a volunteer departure with the border patrol? Perhaps you have a entered the US illegally? Perhaps you over-stayed your authorized time period? There are a number of things that factor into your chances of a successful immigration case.

Beware of attorney’s that will try to tell you “you have a case” over the phone. They can perhaps give you an idea that you may have a case, but for someone to tell you over the phone or by email that you definitely have a case, and that they can win it for you, should be a red flag to yoube cautious.

The good news is that in most cases my firm has an extremely high success rate. For example, in adjustment of statutes -cases which are generally family based, green card applications, my firm has a 99% success rate. If it’s a court case with deportation, we generally have somewhere between a 75-90 percent success rate. I considered that pretty high and I’m very proud of our record.

I encourage you to get a reasonable and well thought out legal opinion from an immigration attorney BEFORE you commit your time, money and resources and put your life in that persons hand. Please be very careful and deliberate about how you choose your immigration attorney.

Hopefully this is been helpful, and remember: know you rights before you undertake something as important as immigration law.

Youre planning a traditional wedding, complete with a flowing white bridal gown, a handsome groom, a beautiful church, gorgeous wedding flowers, traditional vows and a mother-in-law wanting her way. Planning a traditional wedding and dealing with your own mother is stressful enough as it is. Throw in a future mother-in-law with needs of her own and youre facing major stress overload. As you continue your journey toward marital bliss, youll definitely need to deal with your fiancs mother. However, try not to fall into the trap of becoming a mother-in-law pleaser.

The wedding and its planning stages could very well set the tone for your future relationship. If you ignore your grooms mothers wishes, you may live to regret it. On the other hand, if you bend over backwards to please your mother-in-law, you could be setting yourself up for a subservient role for the long term.

So how do you please your mother-in-law without becoming a mother-in-law pleaser? This question has haunted brides for generations. While traditional weddings come with their share of traditions and guidance such as something old, something new, you dont often receive advice for dealing with mother-in-laws. Before figuring out how to keep you and your mother-in-law happy, lets take a look at what your future mother-in-law will be going through.

Traditionally, the brides parents pay for the wedding and act as the hosts. As such, they hold more power as far as the wedding is concerned. For example, whose name is traditionally listed on the wedding invitation? The brides parents, as in Mr. and Mrs. Smith cordially invite you to the wedding of their daughter, Jane. Another area where the brides parents, in this case the brides mother, have more power is in attire. The mother of the groom is expected to defer to the mother of the bride, consulting with her first before selecting a dress and making sure that her dress doesnt upstage that of the mother of the brides.

These two factors alone place mothers of the groom in a position that they may not be well suited for. For example, an independent woman who normally takes an active role in corporate events, party planning, or family gatherings is going to have a tough time backing off and letting another woman run the show. A woman who loves fashion and is well known for her snappy wardrobe may not be happy wearing mauve or asking another woman permission to wear a specific outfit.

Understanding the pre-defined role that your future mother-in-law is expected to play in a traditional wedding can help you understand her behavior which many manifest in many ways. Questions to consider include:
Does she feel like shes an equal partner?
Does she resent playing a less active planning role?
Is she overbearing? Is she overstepping?
Is she not contributing her ideas out of fear of overstepping her role?
What role would she like to play?

At this point, you are only speculating. Considering these questions is a good place to start. However, these same questions could lead you into the trap of becoming a mother-in-law pleaser. You dont necessarily want the same things that your mother-in-law wants, right? Identifying her wants is fine; it helps you understand her. But it doesnt mean you have to grant her wishes. For example, what if your mother-in-law wants to arrive at the church on a Harley Davidson motorcycle instead of the limousine that youve arranged? Or wants to be escorted down the aisle carrying her toy poodle on a pillow?

An excellent way to please your mother-in-law without having to cater to her is to treat your wedding planning as you would any other project. Projects have stakeholders such as investors, customers, and managers. So does your wedding. In your mother-in-laws case, whats at stake? What are her expectations? Whats her role? What activities is she well suited for? Does she understand the projects objectives and goals? Adopting a business-like wedding planning approach from the beginning can help you establish boundaries while also helping your mother-in-law understand the larger picture and her role in it.

Plan a stakeholders meeting with you, your mother, and your future mother-in-law. Ask each woman to write down her vision for the wedding. Explain that youve already done so but are interested in their ideas and input. After everyones written down their ideas, share your ideal wedding and then ask each mother to share her thoughts. This allows you to discover common ground and areas that may be outside of your weddings scope. For example, if you wrote down that you want a small, traditional church wedding with immediate family and close friends only followed by an outdoor reception at the local winery, how do the tentative wedding plans written by the two mothers compare? Is your mother-in-law envisioning a lavish black-tie affair for 400 guests? While your ideas may be worlds apart, they may be strikingly similar. For example, what if she wrote that shed love to see you get married at the same church where your groom was baptized? Youll never know until you ask.

By sharing your own vision from the beginning, before either mother has had a chance to influence you, you will already know what you want, and so will they. This is your framework. You may need to make changes and concessions along the way, but you do not need to stray far from your original vision just to please your mother-in-law.

Back to the wild entrance on a Harley and the toy poodle. Should you give in? Again, you do not need to grant every wish, but if you understand what your mother-in-law really wants, you may be able to compromise. For example, why is riding in on a Harley important to your mother-in-law? Is she trying express her free spirit? Is she known for her wild side? Instead of going for a traditional black limo, why not opt for a stretched black Hummer or some other fun but classy type of limousine, thus allowing your mother-in-laws personality to be expressed without becoming overly intrusive. As far as the poodle, you may need to put your foot down and say no pets. However, if youre open to a whimsical poodle-theme at the reception, let your mother-in-law pick out the table decorations and party favors.

Planning a wedding with other strong women involved requires communication, cooperation, and compromise. If you can find the right balance, you can please your mother-in-law without catering to her every wish.

England and Wales utilise a common-law system, which differs from the civil systems used in most of the rest of Europe. Common law is not based on Acts of Parliament, but on previous decisions by the courts. One principle of common law requires that the courts apply a previous decision made by a court on the same level or higher. Other characteristics of a common-law system include a trial by jury in the criminal courts and for defamation and a system of supremacy of law, by which every citizen is bound.

The development of common law has occurred because of custom and usage, and many principles have developed over time in accordance with what was thought at the time; as opinions and practices change, so does the law. While we now have Acts of Parliament which must be followed by the judiciary, there are still principles made by common law which are enacted by Parliament. This has meant that statutory law has now become more important than case law, although it is case law that provided and developed many points of law enacted by Parliament. When the judiciary is deciding a case in which statute is relevant, they will also need to decide the case in light of common law. Much common law has not been enacted into statute and many of the principles of contract law, for example, are still entrenched in previously decided cases.

Common law develops when a court makes a decision on a case. If a case has been previously decided by a higher court, the lower court has no option but to decide in accordance with it and allow an appeal if necessary. The Court of Appeal and the House of Lords (rather, the new Supreme Court) are the courts which have made most of the decisions that bind lower courts and in order to change the law a new decision must be made by a higher court, or in case of the Supreme Court, itself. Development of common law has taken place over hundreds of years and has occurred differently in different common-law jurisdictions, meaning that although common-law jurisdictions have the same basis for law, the law has developed so as to result in us now having different laws.

It is really not pleasant to talk or even think about family problems, but sometimes it gets necessary to discuss family problems with someone and take help. What if this -someone’ is your -lawyer’? There is nothing wrong in contacting and discussing your family problems with your lawyer for legal advice. You are may be on the verge of breaking up with your life partner and facing a lot of problems or you and your siblings are having tension between each other regarding some property issue or you have some other kind of family problem. There are many reasons for hiring a family lawyer to mediate issues and take them to court when needed.

You may think that you don’t need any legal aid in case of any serious family problem. But you actually do! You need a neutral and unbiased person who can give you best of advice and tackle your case professionally, that you for sure cannot. Some people understand the need of taking legal help but they get afraid of finding good lawyers for them, they think it is a long and complex process. But here is good news for you, reaching law firms or lawyers is now easier than ever before. Internet is the biggest resource for helping you find good lawyers and you can browse lawyer directory online and read their profile. For example if you are in Toronto then you only need to type -legal advice toronto’ and there will be hundreds of results on your screen. You can analyze the details of legal companies and lawyers and hire the best of them.

Every person always pray for the best bonding among family members but at times situation forces us to do what we have never even thought before. If you are confident that what you are doing and thinking is right then go ahead and take legal help. You will for sure get justice.

Visit Legal Advice Toronto and Criminal Lawyer Toronto.

If you’ve found yourself with a legal problem, the first person you should talk to should be your lawyer. All types of reasons can involve any one of us in a courtroom. Not all of these scenarios may involve jail time or a significant sum or money, but may decide in future employment or even the custody of children. It is of the utmost importance that you hire the best firm or practitioner in the field for your specific type of case.

Any reputable law office stands by the offer of a free, initial consultation. This is a valuable opportunity for both parties involved to gain a better understanding of what is needed and to better help each other. Take this time to find out as much about the firm you are considering and how easy it will be to possibly work with the individual you are meeting. This is the time to bring up questions regarding an attorney’s overall experience in and out of the courtroom in regards to cases he or she has won. In addition, ask how much formal training and education the lawyer you are speaking to has in regards to the situation you need assistance with.

When you are in need of legal representation, it is wise to keep your options open and consider more than one possible attorney. Depending on the type of case you are involved with, it may take a long time to settle which means that it could end up being expensive in regards to who is defending you. You will want to find someone who is amply qualified and experienced with the skills you need, but not too costly.

Depending on what you may need defense with, it might be best to seek out a law office that is experienced in multiple areas of law. Certain court matters can deal with multiple areas of legal matters, so it might best suit your needs to have a lawyer that is well versed in all types of legality.

Upon making a final decision regarding the attorney you will retain, be sure to be as honest as possible with all the details of your situation. Every slightest piece of information can bear on the overall outcome of your case, so keep in mind that your advisor is there to help you. Withholding anything from your representation can end up costing you in more ways than one.

Ultimately, your lawyer should be the individual that you feel best meshes with you– not someone you are pressured to accept because of money issues. If you keep your options open and seek out a few possible candidates for retention, you will find not only the best defense, but also one that is affordable. Take your time and be sure to ask as many questions as you need when meeting with any attorney to know you are hiring the best available.

An experienced Rockville MD lawyer can help guide you through the perilous byways of the legal system so that your case has the greatest chance of success. Learn more here: http://www.slglaw.com/.

Daniel Gaffney
Chief Executive Officer
Director
Dan uses his considerable experience in managing technological innovation and complex international operations to drive Brightleafs strategy and growth. Before starting Brightleaf, Dan was President and Chief Operating Officer of Corporate Fundamentals, Inc., a leading business process automation and data structuring solutions provider that he led through international mergers to its purchase by Hemscott Plc and Veronis Schuler. Dan has held executive leadership positions where he has overseen market development efforts for biometric technology firms and has managed strategic operations across fifteen countries on four continents for Compaq. He holds a Masters of Science Administration – Technology and Innovation from Boston University, and a Bachelors of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Massachusetts. Dan is a competitive cyclist and sits on the Board of Directors of several charitable organizations.

Venkat Srinivasan, Ph.D.
Chairman
Dr. Venkat Srinivasan guides Brightleaf with diverse experience from his string of entrepreneurial successes and his rich academic background in credit, finance and knowledge-based technology architectures. He is currently the founding CEO of Rage Frameworks, Inc., which is enabling the creation of process and capital efficient, technology-based businesses and business process automation centers with its patented business process automation technology. Venkat has founded and is currently actively involved in Creditpointe, Inc., and EnglishHelper. Prior to these ventures, Venkat founded Corporate Fundamentals and eCredit, both of which he led as CEO and guided successfully until their sale.
Venkat holds a Ph.D. in Finance from the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, and was an Associate Professor at Northeastern Universitys Graduate School of Business in Boston, MA

Jason Mendelson, Esq.
Director
Jason is a co-founder and Managing Director for Foundry Group. He currently serves as a director to Brightleaf, Oblong, and Pie Digital. He also sits on the boards of the National Venture Capital Association and Silicon Flatirons Entrepreneurship Board. Jason has written extensively about the venture capital and business law industries, specifically around what he calls Law Firm 2.0 and the future of the law firm practice. Previously, Jason was Managing Director and General Counsel for Mobius Venture Capital, and, before that, practiced corporate and securities law at Cooley Godward Kronish, LLP. As an attorney, Jason consummated over $2 billion of venture capital investments, $5 billion in mergers, and acquired extensive experience in fund formation, employment law and general litigation. He began his professional career as a software engineer and consultant at Accenture.
Jason holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics, with distinction, and a Juris Doctorate, cum laude, from the University of Michigan. Jasons writings appear at Mendelson’s Musings and www.askthevc.com.

Ramana Venkata
Director
Perhaps more than anyone, Ramana Venkata understands how to help law firms and legal departments use technology to collect the massive amounts of flat, unstructured data that flows through their documents and organizations and then make that data intelligible so they can act upon it for profit, compliance, and risk mitigation.
He founded Stratify in 1999, and built it into the leading provider of technology-enabled EDD services to AmLaw 200 law firms and Fortune 500 corporations. When Iron Mountain acquired Stratify in 2007, Ramana became an Iron Mountain Senior Vice-President and General Manager of its Stratify division. He worked at Intel Corporation on Data Mining methodologies and applications. He completed five years of Ph.D. research in Scientific Computing and Computational Mathematics at Stanford University, holds a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and a Bachelor of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai. Ramana writes and lectures extensively and lectures frequently on the topic of electronic discovery.

Muthu Palaniappan
Vice-President, Technology
Muthu has over 20 years of experience in the software industry, with extensive expertise in building internet-based process automation solutions and in managing development and technology teams both in the United States and Asia.
Muthu comes to Brightleaf from Hemscott/Ipreo, where he led the development of highly scalable, web-based data automation projects for well-known clients in the financial service sector. Before that, he was Director of Software Development at eCredit.com, where he designed complex rules-based process automation methods. He has extensive experience directing technology and development teams in both the United States and India.
Muthu holds a Masters in Computer Science from National Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of Electronics and Communication Engineering from PSG Tech, India.

Luke OBrien, Esq.
Vice-President, Strategy
Senior Corporate Counsel
Luke is a veteran technology entrepreneur and experienced in-house counsel with a consistent record of producing innovative solutions to intractable problems. He believes deeply in the judicious application of technology to resolve process inefficiencies that separate knowledge-based service providers and their clients. Before joining Brightleaf, he founded, built, and sold technology companies in such diverse areas as SaaS-model legal process automation for the health law industry (Secure Record Services), GPS geoinformatic technology (SkyLinks, which he sold to John Deere), and mobile web directory services (Envenue, which he sold to Switchboard-Infospace).
Luke holds a B.A. in Biology from the College of the Holy Cross and a J.D. from Suffolk University Law School. Luke serves as director for LR4J, an organization he helped found that raises millions of dollars to feed the hungry and homeless in Massachusetts poorest cities. Sometimes, he watches his brother host The Tonight Show.

Tom Bolton
Director of Product Design and Management
Tom uses his 13 years of experience with the best practices of product management and design to ensure that Brightleaf’s groundbreaking legal technology products deliver maximum value to its customers. Specializing in disruptive and next-generation technologies, Tom has managed all facets of the product development lifecycle. Before Brightleaf, Tom led design and product management at Sovereign Bank, Fidelity Investments, and OneSource Information Services, as well as two Web 2.0 startups, Blue Egg and Good2Gether.
Tom holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in English from Princeton University.

Anil Nair
Director of Operations
Anil possesses deep experience in technology management, process automation, and the development of large-scale offshore operations. Before Brightleaf, Anil managed strategic operations across three continents for a Hemscott unit that was acquired by Morningstar and ran client relations groups at eCredit.com and at Corporate Fundamentals.
Anil holds a Masters degree in Management from the University of Bombay and a Masters in Information Systems from the University of Texas. Hes a nationally ranked badminton player and a former national champion who has represented India in International Grand Prix events.

Lynne Zagami, Esq.
Director, Client Strategic Processes
Lynne is a strong advocate for the deployment of technology to bring intelligence and efficiency to the practice of law. She brings experience as a corporate associate in two large law firms to her work at Brightleaf. While at Proskauer Rose LLP and Brown Rudnick LLP, Lynne represented both public and private companies. Her work involved venture capital transactions, SEC reporting and compliance, and mergers and acquisitions. Lynne served on the Brown Rudnick Associate Integration and Development Committee, and has been an active speaker on the the recent changes affecting large law. Her insights have been chronicled by The American Lawyer Magazine and Wall Street Journal Radio.
Lynne holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Womens Studies from Smith College, and a Juris Doctorate from New York Law School. As a member of the New York Law School Moot Court Association, Lynne won numerous awards for her writing and oral advocacy skills. She is a Class Fund Agent for the Smith College Class of 2000, and serves on the Board of Directors of Habitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth.

Walter Wright III, Esq.
Senior Strategic Advisor
As a founding investor, Walter Wright provides Brightleaf with pioneering thought leadership on the law of business and the business of law. As managing member of Trinity Law Group LLC (recognized by the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Registry of Preeminent Lawyers among the most distinguished law firms in America), he focuses intensely on the strategic, organizational, operational, capital and transactional requirements of entrepreneurs, start-ups, emerging and mid-sized companies. He also represents well-known venture capital funds and angel groups.
Walt is a magna cum laude graduate of both Boston College Law School (J.D.) and Tufts University (B.A., M.A). He is consistently recognized as a Boston Magazine Super Lawyer In 2008, Walter Wright was named to the Top 100, an exclusive list of attorneys in Massachusetts who received the highest point totals in the Super Lawyers nomination and blue ribbon peer review process. Of the Top 100, he is one of only 3 lawyers selected in the Business/Corporate category. Walt regularly receives Martindale-Hubbells highest Peer Review Rating as an AV attorney for legal ability and ethical standards.

David Curran, Esq.
Senior Strategic Advisor
Dave Curran is chief legal and compliance officer turned business technology leader with a passion for bringing best practices, technology and cost savings to the intersection of law and business. Dave was CEO (and remains an Advisor) of Integrity Interactive Corporation, a technology-powered risk management business in the ethics and compliance space. Before joining Integrity, Dave was President and CEO of DCI, Inc., a SaaS compliance and content and document management subsidiary of Havas.
Dave has held senior business leadership and legal positions with Campbell Soup Company and Readers Digest. He began his career as an attorney with Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, a boutique New York firm concentrating in litigation, media law, commercial transactions and intellectual property.
Dave received a B.A. with highest honors from SUNY Stony Brook, and a J.D. from the Boston University School of Law. He is a frequent guest speaker at industry and legal forums and has been an Adjunct Professor at Rutgers University Law School and the New School. He is an advisor and director to several companies, including FMP Media and Wisdom of the World and is a Mentor at MITs Venture Mentoring Service.